A01115:2010
An abridgement of the book of acts and monuments of the ChurchAn abridgement of the booke of acts and monumentes of the Church
An abridgement of the book of acts and monuments of the Church: written by that Reverend Father, Master John Fox: and now abridged by Timothy Bright, Doctor of Physic, for such as either through want of leisure, or ability have not the use of so necessary an historyAn abridgement of the booke of acts and monumentes of the Church: written by that Reuerend Father, Maister Iohn Fox: and now abridged by Timothe Bright, Doctour of Phisicke, for such as either through want of leysure, or abilitie haue not the vse of so necessary an history
London: printed by I. Windet, 1589
Volume 2 › Book 10: The tenth Book.Volume 2 › Book 10: The tenth Booke.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Then stepped forth M. Elmer 1Chaplain to the duke of Suffolk, whom M. Mooreman took upon him to answer, and after him the prolocutor called M. Haddon Dean of Exeter, to confirm M. Elmer's argument, to whom Doctor Watson took upon him to answer. Then stepped forth M. Perne, and in argument made declaration of his mind against Transubstantiation, and confirmed the sayings of of M. Elmer and M. Haddon: whom the prolocutor blamed, because the Friday before, he had subscribed to the contrary: and so for that the night did approach, and the time was spent, the Prolocutor giving them praises for their learning,2 did yet notwithstanding conclude, that all reason set apart, the order of the holy church must be received, and all things must be ordered thereby.
Then stepped foorth M. Elmer 1Chaplaine to the duke of Suffolke, whom M. Mooreman tooke vpon him to answer, and after him the prolocutor called M. Haddon Deane of Exceter, to confirme M. Elmers argument, to whome Doctor Watson tooke vpon him to answere. Then stept foorth M. Perne, and in argument made declaration of his minde against Transubstantiation, and confirmed the sayinges of of M. Elmer and M. Haddon: whome the prolocutor blamed, because the Friday before, he had subscribed to the contrary: and so for that the night did approch, and the time was spent, the Prolocutor giuing them praises for their learning,2 did yet notwithstanding conclude, that all reason set apart, the order of the holy church must be receiued, and all things must be ordered thereby.
- 1M. Elmer.
- 2The Romish church against reason or scripture,