A01115:2316
An abridgement of the book of acts and monuments of the ChurchAn abridgement of the booke of acts and monumentes of the Church
An abridgement of the book of acts and monuments of the Church: written by that Reverend Father, Master John Fox: and now abridged by Timothy Bright, Doctor of Physic, for such as either through want of leisure, or ability have not the use of so necessary an historyAn abridgement of the booke of acts and monumentes of the Church: written by that Reuerend Father, Maister Iohn Fox: and now abridged by Timothe Bright, Doctour of Phisicke, for such as either through want of leysure, or abilitie haue not the vse of so necessary an history
London: printed by I. Windet, 1589
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
When he came to the Bishop of London, there was with him the B. of Bangor, before whom he behaved him self in such sort, as the Constables that brought him reported, that they never heard the like. In the Kings bench he was mightily strengthened by the good men which he found there with the other five.
When he came to the Bishop of London, there was with him the B. of Bangor, before whom he behaued him selfe in such sorte, as the Constables that brought him reported, that they neuer heard the like. In the Kings bench he was mightely strengthned by the good men which he found there with the other fiue.
The xxi. of March he was brought to public examination. First in the Bishops Palace at London, where he enquired of him, touching the Sacrament of the Altar: Whereunto he answered contrary to the Popish doctrine, and was reasoned with of the B. Chaplains, with no great authority of scriptures, or fathers.
The xxi. of March hee was brought to publike examination. First in the Bishops Pallace at London, where hée enquired of him, touching the Sacrament of the Altar: Whereunto he answered contrarie to the Popish doctrine, and was reasoned with of the B. Chaplens, with no great authoritie of scriptures, or fathers.
The xxiij. day of the same month next after, the Bishop sent again for Times and Drakes, and ex officio obiected articles. And on the xxvi. day of the same month, he ministered also the same Articles to the other four. To which Popish articles they answered negatively. And in conclusion, the xxviij. of March, they were all brought particularly to the Consistory, before the Bishop of London, to be condemned for heresy. Where (when he required Times and the rest to recant) he replied unto him, that he himself ⟨p. 184⟩