A01532:118
A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation wherein the same is declared, by…A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation vvherein the same is declared, by…
A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation wherein the same is declared, by the confession of their own writers, to have no necessary ground in Gods Word: as also it is further demonstrated to be against Scripture, nature, sense, reason, religion, and the judgement of t5xxauncients, and the faith of our ancestors: written by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and pastor of Rotherhith.A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation vvherein the same is declared, by the confession of their owne writers, to haue no necessary ground in Gods Word: as also it is further demonstrated to be against Scripture, nature, sense, reason, religion, and the iudgement of t5xxauncients, and the faith of our auncestours: written by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and pastor of Rotherhith.
London: printed by John for William Sheffard, 1624London: printed by Iohn for William Sheffard, 1624
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Part 2 › Division 1: Division I.Part 2 › Division 1: Diuision I.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
To give your Ladyship a taste of some of them before hand.
To giue your Ladiship a taste of some of them before hand.
Absurd Positions, and Contradictions. ⟨p. 46⟩1. He saith, that sa Testament, as all learned know, may well signify a Legacis. 2. He maketh tour Saviour to say, This my Blood is the Testament in my blood. 3. He saith, that uChrists blood is offered in the Eucharist, unbloodily, or not as blood. 4. He expoundeth a place of Theod•ret thus; * The 4Sacramental Signs, that is, the Accidents, retain still the same Substance, that is, the same Accidents, 5. He saith that yChrists Body is in the Eucharist, but without bodily existence, that is, his body is there, but not as a body. 6. That zit is there, and yet it followeth not that it is eaten, though that that is there be eaten. 7. He maintaineth aa corporal eating of Christ in the Sacrament, and yet that he is not there corporally eaten. 8. He affirmeth that ball are not saved that believe in Christ, and so fe•de spiritually on Christ. 9. He saith that