A01532:199
A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation wherein the same is declared, by…A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation vvherein the same is declared, by…
A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation wherein the same is declared, by the confession of their own writers, to have no necessary ground in Gods Word: as also it is further demonstrated to be against Scripture, nature, sense, reason, religion, and the judgement of t5xxauncients, and the faith of our ancestors: written by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and pastor of Rotherhith.A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation vvherein the same is declared, by the confession of their owne writers, to haue no necessary ground in Gods Word: as also it is further demonstrated to be against Scripture, nature, sense, reason, religion, and the iudgement of t5xxauncients, and the faith of our auncestours: written by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and pastor of Rotherhith.
London: printed by John for William Sheffard, 1624London: printed by Iohn for William Sheffard, 1624
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Part 2 › Division 4: Division 4.Part 2 › Division 4: Diuision 4.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The work of Theodoret is a Dialogue, wherein he bringeth in disputing an Orthodox Divine against an Heretic, ⟨p. 82⟩that held that nafter Christs resurrection his Humanity lost it own nature, and his flesh was turned into his Deity; in the same manner as these Transubstantiators now say that the Bread in the Eucharist looseth it own nature, and is really changed into Christs natural body. In debating of this Question they light upon the Eucharist, and fall to dispute how the Bread is there said to be Christs body, and what change is wrought on it. The Heretic would have it changed to fit his turn, as our Papists now hold. The Orthodox Divine saith it is no more turned into Christs body, then Christs body is now turned in heaven into his Deity. But you shall have them both verbatim in their own words.
The worke of Theodoret is a Dialogue, wherein hee bringeth in disputing an Orthodoxe Diuine against an Hereticke, ⟨p. 82⟩that held that nafter Christs resurrection his Hemanitie lost it owne nature, and his flesh was turned into his Deitie; in the same manner as these Transubstantiators now say that the Bread in the Euchorist looseth it owne nature, and is really changed into Christs naturall body. In debating of this Question they light vpon the Eucharist, and fall to dispute how the Bread is there said to bee Christs body, and what change is wrought on it. The Hereticke would haue it changed to fit his turne, as our Papists now hold. The Orthodoxe Diuine saith it is no more turned into Christs body, then Christs body is now turned in heauen into his Deitie. But you shall haue them both verbatim in their owne words.
- nPost resurrectionem amisit humanitas naturam suam; & accepit caro mutationem in naturam divinitatis.Post resurrectionem amisit humanitas naturam suam; & accepit caro mutationem in naturam diuinitatis.