A01532:239
A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation wherein the same is declared, by…A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation vvherein the same is declared, by…
A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation wherein the same is declared, by the confession of their own writers, to have no necessary ground in Gods Word: as also it is further demonstrated to be against Scripture, nature, sense, reason, religion, and the judgement of t5xxauncients, and the faith of our ancestors: written by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and pastor of Rotherhith.A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation vvherein the same is declared, by the confession of their owne writers, to haue no necessary ground in Gods Word: as also it is further demonstrated to be against Scripture, nature, sense, reason, religion, and the iudgement of t5xxauncients, and the faith of our auncestours: written by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and pastor of Rotherhith.
London: printed by John for William Sheffard, 1624London: printed by Iohn for William Sheffard, 1624
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Part 2 › Division 4: Division 4.Part 2 › Division 4: Diuision 4.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Heretic. It is acknowledged.
Heretike. It is acknowledged.
Orthodox. Our Saviour indeed, ''he changed the Names, and imposed that Name on his Body that was the Name of the Symbol and Sign of it: and on the Symbol or Sign he imposed that Name, that is the Name of his Body. And so having named himself a Vine, he called that that was a sign Blood.
Orthodox. Our Sauiour indeede, ''hee changed the Names, and imposed that Name on his Body that was the Name of the Symbole and Signe of it: and on the Symbole or Signe he imposed that Name, that is the Name of his Body. And so hauing named himselfe a Uine, he called that that was a signe Blood.