A01532:245
A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation wherein the same is declared, by…A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation vvherein the same is declared, by…
A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation wherein the same is declared, by the confession of their own writers, to have no necessary ground in Gods Word: as also it is further demonstrated to be against Scripture, nature, sense, reason, religion, and the judgement of t5xxauncients, and the faith of our ancestors: written by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and pastor of Rotherhith.A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation vvherein the same is declared, by the confession of their owne writers, to haue no necessary ground in Gods Word: as also it is further demonstrated to be against Scripture, nature, sense, reason, religion, and the iudgement of t5xxauncients, and the faith of our auncestours: written by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and pastor of Rotherhith.
London: printed by John for William Sheffard, 1624London: printed by Iohn for William Sheffard, 1624
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Part 2 › Division 4: Division 4.Part 2 › Division 4: Diuision 4.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
You have heard Theodoret at large. It remaineth now to consider how he overthroweth that which I produce him for, to wit, that the bread & wine in the Sacrament remain ⟨p. 86⟩for substance still the same; and that the Bread is called Christs body figuratively; as his body is else-where called Bread; and the wine his blood figuratively, as himself is termed a Vine: Or to consider rather, if you please (because that any one at the first sight may see) how fitly this mans explication of Theodoret agreeth with Theodorets own words.
You haue heard Theodoret at large. It remaineth now to consider how he ouerthroweth that which I produce him for, to wit, that the bread & wine in the Sacrament remaine ⟨p. 86⟩for substance still the same; and that the Bread is called Christs body figuratiuely; as his body is else-where called Bread; and the wine his blood figuratiuely, as himselfe is tearmed a Vine: Or to consider rather, if you please (because that any one at the first sight may see) how fitly this mans explication of Theodoret agreeth with Theodorets owne words.
By Sacramental Signs (saith he) Theodoret meaneth not the Substance of Bread and Wine.
By Sacramentall Signes (saith he) Theodoret meaneth not the Substance of Bread and Wine.
1. He understandeth by the mystical Signs that that is offered to God by Gods Priests. And doth the Priest then offer nothing to God but accidents only? Indeed they tell us that