A01532:293
A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation wherein the same is declared, by…A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation vvherein the same is declared, by…
A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation wherein the same is declared, by the confession of their own writers, to have no necessary ground in Gods Word: as also it is further demonstrated to be against Scripture, nature, sense, reason, religion, and the judgement of t5xxauncients, and the faith of our ancestors: written by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and pastor of Rotherhith.A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation vvherein the same is declared, by the confession of their owne writers, to haue no necessary ground in Gods Word: as also it is further demonstrated to be against Scripture, nature, sense, reason, religion, and the iudgement of t5xxauncients, and the faith of our auncestours: written by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and pastor of Rotherhith.
London: printed by John for William Sheffard, 1624London: printed by Iohn for William Sheffard, 1624
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Part 2 › Division 6: Division 6.Part 2 › Division 6: Diuision 6.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
§▪ 2. Here by the way (though little to the present purpose, to wit, the clearing of Pope Nicholas) that he may fill up his Discourse with some show of allegations;
§▪ 2. Heere by the way (though little to the present purpose, to wit, the cleering of Pope Nicholas) that hee may fill vp his Discourse with some shew of allegations;
1. He telleth us that John Huss was of their judgement concerning the Sacrament; and allegeth a sorry Rome to prove it; which whence he hath, I know not, nor am able to say, what Huss sometime held: But sure I am that in the Council of Constance one of the Articles, ⟨p. 111⟩wherewith he was charged, and for which condemned, and (contrary to the Emperors safe conduct granted him) perfidious•• burnt, was athe denial of Transubstantiation as a device invented to delude simple people with: and the teaching and maintaining as well publicly as privately that the substance of bread, and material bread, remained after Consecration in the Sacrament; deposed by many that had heard him, and that had argued about it with him.
1. Hee telleth vs that Iohn Husse was of their iudgement concerning the Sacrament; and alledgeth a sorry Rome to prooue it; which whence hee hath, I know not, nor am able to say, what Husse sometime held: But sure I am that in the Councell of Constance one of the Articles, ⟨p. 111⟩wherewith he was charged, and for which condemned, and (contrary to the Emperours safeconduct granted him) perfidious•• burnt, was