A01532:310
A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation wherein the same is declared, by…A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation vvherein the same is declared, by…
A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation wherein the same is declared, by the confession of their own writers, to have no necessary ground in Gods Word: as also it is further demonstrated to be against Scripture, nature, sense, reason, religion, and the judgement of t5xxauncients, and the faith of our ancestors: written by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and pastor of Rotherhith.A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation vvherein the same is declared, by the confession of their owne writers, to haue no necessary ground in Gods Word: as also it is further demonstrated to be against Scripture, nature, sense, reason, religion, and the iudgement of t5xxauncients, and the faith of our auncestours: written by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and pastor of Rotherhith.
London: printed by John for William Sheffard, 1624London: printed by Iohn for William Sheffard, 1624
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Part 2 › Division 6: Division 6.Part 2 › Division 6: Diuision 6.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
§ 4. Here this profound and learned Doctor telleth us, that his superficial Adversary hath in an unlearned and slender manner endeavoured to prove that our Saviours discourse there is not to be understood of Sacramental Manducation, but of spiritual eating his flesh and blood by believing in him.
§ 4. Here this profound and learned Doctor telleth vs, that his superficiall Aduersarie hath in an vnlearned and slender manner endeauoured to prooue that our Sauiours discourse there is not to be vnderstood of Sacramentall Manducation, but of spirituall eating his flesh and blood by beleeuing in him.
I propound two Propositions to be proved.
I propound two Propositions to be prooued.
1. That the words are not to be understood of any such corporal eating and drinking, as they hold.
1. That the words are not to be vnderstood of any such corporall eating and drinking, as they hold.