A01532:328
A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation wherein the same is declared, by…A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation vvherein the same is declared, by…
A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation wherein the same is declared, by the confession of their own writers, to have no necessary ground in Gods Word: as also it is further demonstrated to be against Scripture, nature, sense, reason, religion, and the judgement of t5xxauncients, and the faith of our ancestors: written by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and pastor of Rotherhith.A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation vvherein the same is declared, by the confession of their owne writers, to haue no necessary ground in Gods Word: as also it is further demonstrated to be against Scripture, nature, sense, reason, religion, and the iudgement of t5xxauncients, and the faith of our auncestours: written by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and pastor of Rotherhith.
London: printed by John for William Sheffard, 1624London: printed by Iohn for William Sheffard, 1624
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Part 2 › Division 6: Division 6.Part 2 › Division 6: Diuision 6.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
2. Christ (saith he) compareth the eating of his flesh to the Jews eating of Manna; which was a corporal food really eaten by them: and he must needs therefore speak of the Eucharist. Bellarmine was not so absurd indeed as to 1argue on this manner. As if the Manna were not also a spiritual type of Christ: and Christ might not as well compare the type with the truth; as the type with the countertype; the type of the Manna qa spiritual food then really taken with the spiritual eating of Christ that was therein figured.
2. Christ (saith he) compareth the eating of his flesh to the Iewes eating of Manna; which was a corporall food really eaten by them: and he must needs therefore speake of the Eucharist. Bellarmine was not so absurd indeed as to 1argue on this manner. As if the Manna were not also a spirituall type of Christ: and Christ might not as well compare the type with the truth; as the type with the countertype; the type of the Manna qa spirituall food then really taken with the spirituall eating of Christ that was therin figured.
- 1o In cruce facta est de•octio ca••is, &c. Bonaven. in sent. l 4. c. 9. q 2.o In cruce facta est de•octio ca••is, &c. Bonauen. in sent. l 4. c. 9. q 2.
- q1 Cor. 10. 3.