A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation wherein the same is declared, by…A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation vvherein the same is declared, by…

And he addeth that ^speradventure our Saviour called his flesh sometimes bread, to show that under the species of bread it was to be eaten. So that all the force of Bellarmines Argument is but merely conjectural, and dependeth upon a peradventure, which he cannot certainly aver. But ²without all peradventure he affirmed before that the bread of which our Saviour said; ^uMy Father giveth you the true bread from heaven; and ^xThe bread of God is he that came from heaven and giveth life to the world: and ^yI am the bread of life; he that cometh to me shall never hunger; and he that believeth in me shall never thirst: and ^zI am the bread that came down from heaven: and again, ^aI am the bread of life: and ^bThis is the bread that came down from heaven, that whosoever eateth thereof should never die: and ^cI am the living bread that came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread he shall live for ever: that the bread I say, of which he said all this, was not the Eucharist, or the sacramental bread, and none of all this directly and properly concerneth it. And well may we put it out of peradventure, that the bread of which our Saviour saith ^dit is his flesh that he will give for the life of the ⟨p. 125⟩world, and ^e