A01532:367
A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation wherein the same is declared, by…A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation vvherein the same is declared, by…
A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation wherein the same is declared, by the confession of their own writers, to have no necessary ground in Gods Word: as also it is further demonstrated to be against Scripture, nature, sense, reason, religion, and the judgement of t5xxauncients, and the faith of our ancestors: written by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and pastor of Rotherhith.A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation vvherein the same is declared, by the confession of their owne writers, to haue no necessary ground in Gods Word: as also it is further demonstrated to be against Scripture, nature, sense, reason, religion, and the iudgement of t5xxauncients, and the faith of our auncestours: written by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and pastor of Rotherhith.
London: printed by John for William Sheffard, 1624London: printed by Iohn for William Sheffard, 1624
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Part 2 › Division 6: Division 6.Part 2 › Division 6: Diuision 6.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
1. In this very particular; he confesseth that dmany of the Authors before mentioned expound that 6. Chap. of John as the Heretics do: but they submit themselves (saith he) and their writings to the Censure of the Councils and Popes; which the Heretics do not.
1. In this very particular; he confesseth that dmany of the Authors before mentioned expound that 6. Chap. of Iohn as the Heretikes doe: but they submit themselues (saith he) and their writings to the Censure of the Councels and Popes; which the Heretikes doe not.
- dBellarm. de Euchar. lib. 1. cap. 5.
2. In the present controversy, Durandus held not a Transubstantiation, but a transformation in the Sacrament: ewhich opinion (saith he) is heretical; and yet was he no Heretic; because he was ready to yield to the judgement of the Church.
2. In the present controuersie, Durandus held not a Transubstantiation, but a transformation in the Sacrament: ewhich opinion (saith he) is hereticall; and yet was hee no Heretike; because he was ready to yeeld to the iudgement of the Church.
- eIdem ibid. lib. 3. cap. 13.