A01532:462
A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation wherein the same is declared, by…A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation vvherein the same is declared, by…
A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation wherein the same is declared, by the confession of their own writers, to have no necessary ground in Gods Word: as also it is further demonstrated to be against Scripture, nature, sense, reason, religion, and the judgement of t5xxauncients, and the faith of our ancestors: written by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and pastor of Rotherhith.A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation vvherein the same is declared, by the confession of their owne writers, to haue no necessary ground in Gods Word: as also it is further demonstrated to be against Scripture, nature, sense, reason, religion, and the iudgement of t5xxauncients, and the faith of our auncestours: written by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and pastor of Rotherhith.
London: printed by John for William Sheffard, 1624London: printed by Iohn for William Sheffard, 1624
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Part 2 › Division 11: Division 11.Part 2 › Division 11: Diuision 11.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
1. Here are divers things that are questionable both in Divinity and Philosophy: which albeit he take pro concessis, will not so easily be granted him, till they be better proved then as yet they are, howsoever we exclude not diverse of them out of the reach of Gods omnipotency, even as he understandeth them; as
1. Here are diuers things that are questionable both in Diuinity and Philosophy: which albeit he take pro concessis, will not so easily be granted him, till they be better prooued then as yet they are, howsoeuer we exclude not diuerse of them out of the reach of Gods omnipotency, euen as he vnderstandeth them; as
1. The manner of the fsouls being in distant parts of the body is disputable: nor is there the same reason of bodies and of spirits.
1. The manner of the fsoules being in distant parts of the body is disputable: nor is there the same reason of bodies and of spirits.
- fVise Jul. Scalig. de subtil. exercit. 307. Sect. 29. Aegidium in l. 2. de anima. c. 2. q. 6. & Hospinian. de sede anim.Vise Iul. Scalig. de subtil. exercit. 307. Sect. 29. Aegidium in l. 2. de anima. c. 2. q. 6. & Hospinian. de sede anim.
2. The torment of spirits whether it be by corporal fire or no, is not agreed on as a matter of faith;