A01532:468
A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation wherein the same is declared, by…A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation vvherein the same is declared, by…
A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation wherein the same is declared, by the confession of their own writers, to have no necessary ground in Gods Word: as also it is further demonstrated to be against Scripture, nature, sense, reason, religion, and the judgement of t5xxauncients, and the faith of our ancestors: written by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and pastor of Rotherhith.A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation vvherein the same is declared, by the confession of their owne writers, to haue no necessary ground in Gods Word: as also it is further demonstrated to be against Scripture, nature, sense, reason, religion, and the iudgement of t5xxauncients, and the faith of our auncestours: written by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and pastor of Rotherhith.
London: printed by John for William Sheffard, 1624London: printed by Iohn for William Sheffard, 1624
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Part 2 › Division 11: Division 11.Part 2 › Division 11: Diuision 11.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
6. For his Ascension; to omit, that this usolidity of the Orbs is in Philosophy a thing questionable; and such a point, as if it be denied, this great Doctor will hardly be ever able to make good: I answer with Durand; that xWhether the heavens be divisible in their own nature, or by divine virtue, (as the one they well may be, and the other certainly they are) there is no necessity that Christs body in his Ascension should be together in the same place with the bodies of the Orbs.
6. For his Ascension; to omit, that this usolidity of the Orbes is in Philosophy a thing questionable; and such a point, as if it bee denyed, this great Doctor will hardly be euer able to make good: I answer with Durand; that xWhether the heauens bee divisible in their owne nature, or by divine vertue, (as the one they well may bee, and the other certainly they are) there is no necessity that Christs body in his Ascension should be together in the same place with the bodies of the Orbes.
- uVid: Zanc de operibus creat part. 2. l. 2. c. 3. Th. 3 Et Keckerm. system. physic. l. 2 c. 2.
- xDurand. ubi sup. ad 1.Durand. vbi sup. ad 1.
So that in none of these Examples there is any necessity of two bodies being in one place at once. Which yet if it were proved (if they will believe their own Schoolmen) were not sufficient. For howsoever this great Doctor tell us, that it is equally above nature for many bodies to