A01532:541
A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation wherein the same is declared, by…A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation vvherein the same is declared, by…
A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation wherein the same is declared, by the confession of their own writers, to have no necessary ground in Gods Word: as also it is further demonstrated to be against Scripture, nature, sense, reason, religion, and the judgement of t5xxauncients, and the faith of our ancestors: written by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and pastor of Rotherhith.A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation vvherein the same is declared, by the confession of their owne writers, to haue no necessary ground in Gods Word: as also it is further demonstrated to be against Scripture, nature, sense, reason, religion, and the iudgement of t5xxauncients, and the faith of our auncestours: written by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and pastor of Rotherhith.
London: printed by John for William Sheffard, 1624London: printed by Iohn for William Sheffard, 1624
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Part 2 › Division 14: Division 14.Part 2 › Division 14: Diuision 14.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
2. If this be (as they say) an unbloody sacrifice, and Christ be therein unbloodily sacrificed: how is it that they affirm that bChrists blood is verily shed in it, and was therein really shed before it was shed upon the Cross: which to prove also cBellarmine in expounding the words of Christs Institution (contrary to the express dCanon of the Council of Trent) leaveth their own vulgar translation, which they count authentical; as also the Canon of their Mass, the principal part of their service; which both have, Qui pro vobis effundetur, That shall be (or, is to be) shed for you; because they fitted not ⟨p. 202⟩his turn so well; and presseth the words according to the Greek, eQui pro vobis effunditur; That is poured out for you. If Christs very blood be poured out in it, how is it an unbloody offering? Or how is not this a riddle? There is blood there, but not as blood: And it is the very same with Christs bloody passion, and yet celebrated in an unbloody manner.
2. If this be (as they say) an vnbloody sacrifice, and Christ be therein vnbloodily sacrificed: how is it that they affirme that bChrists blood is verily shed in it, and was therein really shed before it was shed vpon the Crosse: which to prooue also cBellarmine in expounding the words of Christs Institution (contrary to the expresse dCanon of the Councell of Trent) leaueth their owne vulgar translation, which they count autenticall; as also the Canon of their Masse, the principall part of their seruice; which both haue, Qui pro vobis effundetur, That shall be (or, is to be) shed for you; because they fitted not