A01532:542
A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation wherein the same is declared, by…A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation vvherein the same is declared, by…
A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation wherein the same is declared, by the confession of their own writers, to have no necessary ground in Gods Word: as also it is further demonstrated to be against Scripture, nature, sense, reason, religion, and the judgement of t5xxauncients, and the faith of our ancestors: written by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and pastor of Rotherhith.A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation vvherein the same is declared, by the confession of their owne writers, to haue no necessary ground in Gods Word: as also it is further demonstrated to be against Scripture, nature, sense, reason, religion, and the iudgement of t5xxauncients, and the faith of our auncestours: written by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and pastor of Rotherhith.
London: printed by John for William Sheffard, 1624London: printed by Iohn for William Sheffard, 1624
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Part 2 › Division 14: Division 14.Part 2 › Division 14: Diuision 14.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
3. Is it be an unbloody offering, how is it (as they use to say) a sin sacrifice; when fwithout shedding of blood (as the Apostle telleth us) there is no remission of sins, gNor was there ever any sin sacrifice without blood-shed, saith Bellarmine. The truth is, that hChrist once for all went into the holy place with blood, and thereby obtained eternal redemption. As for their unbloody blood, it is but a mere counterfeit. And in this case with their own Gloss may we soon stop their mouths, which expoundeth (contrary to Bellarmine) those words in the Canon, Christs blood is shed, or poured out; ithat is the shedding of it is signified, in the Eucharist.
3. Is it be an vnbloody offering, how is it (as they vse to say) a sinne sacrifice; when fwithout sheading of blood (as the Apostle telleth vs) there is no remission of sinnes, gNor was there euer any sinne sacrisice without blood-shead, saith Bellarmine. The truth is, that hChrist once for all went into the holy place with blood, and thereby obtained eternall redemption. As for their vnbloody blood, it is but a meere counterfaite. And in this case with their owne Glosse may we soone stop their mouthes, which expoundeth (contrary to Bellarmine) those words in the Canon, Christs blood is shead, or poured out; ithat is the sheading of it is signified, in the Eucharist.