A01532:589
A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation wherein the same is declared, by…A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation vvherein the same is declared, by…
A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation wherein the same is declared, by the confession of their own writers, to have no necessary ground in Gods Word: as also it is further demonstrated to be against Scripture, nature, sense, reason, religion, and the judgement of t5xxauncients, and the faith of our ancestors: written by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and pastor of Rotherhith.A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation vvherein the same is declared, by the confession of their owne writers, to haue no necessary ground in Gods Word: as also it is further demonstrated to be against Scripture, nature, sense, reason, religion, and the iudgement of t5xxauncients, and the faith of our auncestours: written by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and pastor of Rotherhith.
London: printed by John for William Sheffard, 1624London: printed by Iohn for William Sheffard, 1624
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Part 2 › Division 14: Division 14.Part 2 › Division 14: Diuision 14.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
§ 11. TO make us believe that this their doctrine of 1Transubstantiation is of great antiquity, he telleth us that the Centurists blame almost all the Fathers universally of Constantine's time, among other things, for teaching the doctrine of Transubstantiation, and adoration of the Sacrament.
§ 11. TO make vs beleeue that this their doctrine of 1Transubstantiation is of great antiquitie, he telleth vs that the Centurists blame almost all the Fathers vniuersally of Constantines time, among other things, for teaching the doctrine of Transubstantiation, and adoration of the Sacrament.
- 1T. G.
This is all most false, as much is also of the rest by him here affirmed. They allege only some passages out of counterfeit works, gsome going under Ambrose his name, as the prayers preparing to the Mass, censured by hErasmus for such, wherein mention is made of Adoration of the bread in the Sacrament; which they note also not to be found in any of Ambrose his own works; isome going under Athanasius his name, as an idle Legend of an Image of Christ; which kBaronius himself disavoweth; wherein mention is made of no flesh of Christ left in the world, but what is made upon the Altar: (and how have they lhis foreskin among their holy relics then?)