A01532:78
A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation wherein the same is declared, by…A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation vvherein the same is declared, by…
A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation wherein the same is declared, by the confession of their own writers, to have no necessary ground in Gods Word: as also it is further demonstrated to be against Scripture, nature, sense, reason, religion, and the judgement of t5xxauncients, and the faith of our ancestors: written by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and pastor of Rotherhith.A discussion of the popish doctrine of transubstantiation vvherein the same is declared, by the confession of their owne writers, to haue no necessary ground in Gods Word: as also it is further demonstrated to be against Scripture, nature, sense, reason, religion, and the iudgement of t5xxauncients, and the faith of our auncestours: written by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and pastor of Rotherhith.
London: printed by John for William Sheffard, 1624London: printed by Iohn for William Sheffard, 1624
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Part 1 › The Sum of all that hath been said.Part 1 › The Summe of all that hath beene said.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
1. That there is nothing in the Gospel whereby it may appear that those words of our Saviour, This is my Body, may not be figuratively understood, is by Cardinal Caietan confessed.
1. THat there is nothing in the Gospel whereby it may appeare that those words of our Sauiour, This is my Body, may not be figuratiuely vnderstood, is by Cardinal Caietan confessed.
2. That our Saviours words of eating his flesh and drinking his blood are to be understood not corporally but spiritually, is acknowledged by many Popish writers of great note: and is, beside other Reasons, by a Rule given by Augustine evidently proved.
2. That our Sauiours words of eating his flesh and drinking his blood are to be vnderstood not corporally but spiritually, is acknowledged by many Popish writers of great note: and is, beside other Reasons, by a Rule giuen by Augustine euidently prooued.
3. That the Elements in the Sacrament remain in Substance the same, and are not really transubstantiated into Christs Body and Blood, is evinced by divers Arguments.
3. That the Elements in the Sacrament remaine in Substance the same, and are not really transubstantiated into Christs Body and Blood, is euinced by diuers Arguments.