A01540:155
A just defence of certain passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and…A iust defence of certaine passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and…
A just defence of certain passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and use of lots, against such exceptions and oppositions as have been made thereunto to Mr. I.B. Wherein the insufficiency of his answers given to the arguments brought in defence of a lusorious lot is manifested; the imbecility of his arguments produced against the same further discovered; and the point it self in controversy more fully cleared; by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and author of the former treatise.A iust defence of certaine passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and vse of lots, against such exceptions and oppositions as have beene made thereunto to Mr. I.B. Wherein the insufficiencie of his answers giuen to the arguments brought in defence of a lusorious lot is manifested; the imbecillitie of his arguments produced against the same further discouered; and the point it selfe in controuersie more fully cleared; by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and author of the former treatise.
London: printed by John Haviland for Robert Bird, 1623London: printed by Iohn Haviland for Robert Bird, 1623
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
T. G. How timorous the Tenet is, hath before been discussed. And if the Conclusion here be no more timorous, it mattereth not much.
T. G. How timorous the Tenent is, hath before been discussed. And if the Conclusion here be no more timorous, it mattereth not much.
I. B. Why doth not Mr. G. conclude positively thus? Therefore a Lot may be used for matter of recreation and delight.
I. B. Why doth not Mr. G. conclude positiuely thus? Therefore a Lot may be vsed for matter of recreation and delight.
T. G. It is enough if the premises necessarily infer the Conclusion. Which, what had it mattered, if it had wholly been omitted? as cit is sometime with our Saviour himself in his disputes. But it is dthe part of a bad pleader, as the Heathen man well observeth, to leave the main matter, and trifle thus about terms.
T. G. It is enough if the premises necessarily inferre the Conclusion. Which, what had it mattered, if it had wholly beene omitted? as cit is sometime with our Sauiour himselfe in his disputes. But it is dthe part of a bad pleader, as the Heathen man well obserueth, to leaue the maine matter, and trifle thus about termes.