A01540:248
A just defence of certain passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and…A iust defence of certaine passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and…
A just defence of certain passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and use of lots, against such exceptions and oppositions as have been made thereunto to Mr. I.B. Wherein the insufficiency of his answers given to the arguments brought in defence of a lusorious lot is manifested; the imbecility of his arguments produced against the same further discovered; and the point it self in controversy more fully cleared; by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and author of the former treatise.A iust defence of certaine passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and vse of lots, against such exceptions and oppositions as have beene made thereunto to Mr. I.B. Wherein the insufficiencie of his answers giuen to the arguments brought in defence of a lusorious lot is manifested; the imbecillitie of his arguments produced against the same further discouered; and the point it selfe in controuersie more fully cleared; by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and author of the former treatise.
London: printed by John Haviland for Robert Bird, 1623London: printed by Iohn Haviland for Robert Bird, 1623
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
I. B. But Mr. G. speaketh of Christian liberty, not of licentiousness. Then let us consider what he saith. For both the premises of this Argument are flatly to be denied.
I. B. But Mr. G. speaketh of Christian liberty, not of licentiousnesse. Then let vs consider what he saith. For both the premises of this Argument are flatly to be denied.
T. G. When Mr. B. saith, both the premises, his meaning is, not of mine Argument, but of this Argument, that is, of his own, for the one of them, to wit the Proposition, at least, as appeareth by the reason of his denial an exed.
T. G. When Mr. B. saith, both the premises, his meaning is, not of mine Argument, but of this Argument, that is, of his owne, for the one of them, to wit the Proposition, at least, as appeareth by the reason of his deniall ann exed.
I. B. ⟨p. 101⟩For sundry good creatures have a natural power to impoison. But Christian liberty giveth us not free use thereof to impoison at pleasure.
I. B. ⟨p. 101⟩For sundry good creatures haue a naturall power to impoison. But Christian liberty giueth vs not free vse thereof to impoison at pleasure.