A01540:380
A just defence of certain passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and…A iust defence of certaine passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and…
A just defence of certain passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and use of lots, against such exceptions and oppositions as have been made thereunto to Mr. I.B. Wherein the insufficiency of his answers given to the arguments brought in defence of a lusorious lot is manifested; the imbecility of his arguments produced against the same further discovered; and the point it self in controversy more fully cleared; by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and author of the former treatise.A iust defence of certaine passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and vse of lots, against such exceptions and oppositions as have beene made thereunto to Mr. I.B. Wherein the insufficiencie of his answers giuen to the arguments brought in defence of a lusorious lot is manifested; the imbecillitie of his arguments produced against the same further discouered; and the point it selfe in controuersie more fully cleared; by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and author of the former treatise.
London: printed by John Haviland for Robert Bird, 1623London: printed by Iohn Haviland for Robert Bird, 1623
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
I. B. Neither doth he soundly prove an immediate and special providence, or extraordinary event to be in an extraordinary, and not in an ordinary Lot.
I. B. Neither doth he soundly proue an immediate and speciall prouidence, or extraordinary euent to be in an extraordinary, and not in an ordinary Lot.
T. G. Neither do I affirm it generally of the former, but of all such of that kind as are used by Gods special direction, in which Mr. B. himself here acknowledgeth it: and of the latter what I say, I have ⟨p. 172⟩iin divers places proved. Here I speak only by way of distinction between the one and the other, which let Mr. B. if he can disprove▪
T. G. Neither doe I affirme it generally of the former, but of all such of that kinde as are vsed by Gods speciall direction, in which Mr. B. himselfe here acknowledgeth it: and of the latter what I say, I haue ⟨p. 172⟩iin diuers places proued. Here I speake onely by way of distinction betweene the one and the other, which let Mr. B. if he can disproue▪
- iOf Lots, chap. 2. sect. 5. & chap. 7. sect. 4.