A01540:381
A just defence of certain passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and…A iust defence of certaine passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and…
A just defence of certain passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and use of lots, against such exceptions and oppositions as have been made thereunto to Mr. I.B. Wherein the insufficiency of his answers given to the arguments brought in defence of a lusorious lot is manifested; the imbecility of his arguments produced against the same further discovered; and the point it self in controversy more fully cleared; by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and author of the former treatise.A iust defence of certaine passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and vse of lots, against such exceptions and oppositions as have beene made thereunto to Mr. I.B. Wherein the insufficiencie of his answers giuen to the arguments brought in defence of a lusorious lot is manifested; the imbecillitie of his arguments produced against the same further discouered; and the point it selfe in controuersie more fully cleared; by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and author of the former treatise.
London: printed by John Haviland for Robert Bird, 1623London: printed by Iohn Haviland for Robert Bird, 1623
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
I. B. Indeed, the certain event of an extraordinary Lot may in faith be expected, because of Gods special direction. And why not so in an ordinary Lot? Seeing God adviseth us pag. 135. to use Lots for the ending of Controversies, Prou. 18. 18. and assureth us that the whole disposing of them is of him, Prou. 16. 33.
I. B. Indeed, the certaine euent of an extraordinory Lot may in faith be expected, because of Gods speciall direction. And why not so in an ordinary Lot? Seeing God aduiseth vs pag. 135. to vse Lots for the ending of Controuersies, Prou. 18. 18. and assureth vs that the whole disposing of them is of him, Prou. 16. 33.
T. G. I might answer in a word: Let Mr. B. make trial. But I refer my self to pthe instances given by me elsewhere, of divers in several places casting Lots upon the same persons for the self same places, and to what hereof hath been here before said. Only I add that no such special assurance is given us by God for the one, as in such cases was for the other. Nor doth any such thing follow thence, because God hath advised us rather thereby to end controversies than to give way to courses more inconvenient, that therefore God will by a special ⟨p. 174⟩