A01540:453
A just defence of certain passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and…A iust defence of certaine passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and…
A just defence of certain passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and use of lots, against such exceptions and oppositions as have been made thereunto to Mr. I.B. Wherein the insufficiency of his answers given to the arguments brought in defence of a lusorious lot is manifested; the imbecility of his arguments produced against the same further discovered; and the point it self in controversy more fully cleared; by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and author of the former treatise.A iust defence of certaine passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and vse of lots, against such exceptions and oppositions as have beene made thereunto to Mr. I.B. Wherein the insufficiencie of his answers giuen to the arguments brought in defence of a lusorious lot is manifested; the imbecillitie of his arguments produced against the same further discouered; and the point it selfe in controuersie more fully cleared; by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and author of the former treatise.
London: printed by John Haviland for Robert Bird, 1623London: printed by Iohn Haviland for Robert Bird, 1623
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Here that appeareth that I told you before, that1 unless you grant Mr. B. what he could not in the former Argument make good, all is gone. For here is nothing that will stand, unless that be made good. So that by his own acknowledgement nothing needed to be anew answered to this Argument, if sufficient Answer have been given to the former.
Here that appeareth that I told you before, that1 vnlesse you grant Mr. B. what he could not in the former Argument make good, all is gone. For here is nothing that will stand, vnlesse that be made good. So that by his owne acknowledgment nothing needed to be anew answered to this Argument, if sufficient Answer haue beene giuen to the former.
- 1T. G. Rejoinder.T. G. Reioinder.
But Mr. G. he saith upon such ground denieth all this.
But Mr. G. hee saith vpon such ground denieth all this.
1. Mr. G. need lay no ground at all for his denial: It is enough for him barely to deny some Proposition, which upon his denial Mr. B. is to prove.