A01540:599
A just defence of certain passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and…A iust defence of certaine passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and…
A just defence of certain passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and use of lots, against such exceptions and oppositions as have been made thereunto to Mr. I.B. Wherein the insufficiency of his answers given to the arguments brought in defence of a lusorious lot is manifested; the imbecility of his arguments produced against the same further discovered; and the point it self in controversy more fully cleared; by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and author of the former treatise.A iust defence of certaine passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and vse of lots, against such exceptions and oppositions as have beene made thereunto to Mr. I.B. Wherein the insufficiencie of his answers giuen to the arguments brought in defence of a lusorious lot is manifested; the imbecillitie of his arguments produced against the same further discouered; and the point it selfe in controuersie more fully cleared; by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and author of the former treatise.
London: printed by John Haviland for Robert Bird, 1623London: printed by Iohn Haviland for Robert Bird, 1623
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
T. G. Mr. B. weary, it seemeth, of arguing, cometh now to asking. The end of his Question, he saith, is for the better understanding of the second part of my Reason. Why? admit my reason or some part of it were not worth a button, how doth Mr. B. make ⟨p. 263⟩good the Proposition, which all this while he should have proved? But to the Question, I answer as the Spartans sometime in a word: *No. And what then? Are there no more circumstances to be observed but these only? Or are there not general Rules according to which I require the use of such things to be regulated?
T. G. Mr. B. weary, it seemeth, of arguing, commeth now to asking. The end of his Question, he saith, is for the better vnderstanding of the second part of my Reason. Why? admit my reason or some part of it were not worth a button, how doth Mr. B. make ⟨p. 263⟩good the Proposition, which all this while he should haue proued? But to the Question, I answer as the Spartans sometime in a word: *No. And what then? Are there no more circumstances to be obserued but these onely? Or are there not generall Rules according to which I require the vse of such things to be regulated?
- *Ad prolixam Philippi Maced. qua quaedam ab eis deposcebat epistolam, unica vocula an vocally respondebant, [Greek or Hebrew], vel (ut Scal. ad Euseb. ex Athen. itemque ad Auson ex Athen. & Gell.) Hinc Auson. epist. 25. Una suit quondam, qua respondere Lacones Litera, & irato Regi placuere negantes. Idem & Dionysio rescripsit Philoxenus: unde Proverbium, [Greek or Hebrew]. Suidas.Ad prolixam Philippi Maced. qua quaedam ab eis deposcebat epistolam, unica vocula an vocali respōdebant, 〈non-Latin alphabet〉, vel (ut Scal. ad Euseb. ex Athen. itemque ad Auson ex Athen. & Gell.) Hinc Auson. epist. 25. Vna suit quondam, qua respondere Lacones Litera, & irato Regi placuere negantes. Idem & Dionysio rescripsit Philoxenus: unde Prouerbium, . Suidas.