A01540:605
A just defence of certain passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and…A iust defence of certaine passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and…
A just defence of certain passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and use of lots, against such exceptions and oppositions as have been made thereunto to Mr. I.B. Wherein the insufficiency of his answers given to the arguments brought in defence of a lusorious lot is manifested; the imbecility of his arguments produced against the same further discovered; and the point it self in controversy more fully cleared; by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and author of the former treatise.A iust defence of certaine passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and vse of lots, against such exceptions and oppositions as have beene made thereunto to Mr. I.B. Wherein the insufficiencie of his answers giuen to the arguments brought in defence of a lusorious lot is manifested; the imbecillitie of his arguments produced against the same further discouered; and the point it selfe in controuersie more fully cleared; by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and author of the former treatise.
London: printed by John Haviland for Robert Bird, 1623London: printed by Iohn Haviland for Robert Bird, 1623
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
T. G. Is there not an evident intimation that God had prescribed his own worship, (unless it be presupposed that he would not at all be worshipped) when for this very cause he rejecteth some kind of worship, because he had not prescribed the same.
T. G. Is there not an euident intimation that God had prescribed his owne worship, (vnlesse it be presupposed that he would not at all be worshipped) when for this very cause he reiecteth some kinde of worship, because he had not prescribed the same.
I. B. ⟨p. 265⟩To the same purpose writeth Paul to the Colossians against the Traditions of men, and will-worship, not for Mr. Gs. cause, but because in so worshipping they held not the Head, vers. 19. which is Christ, King of his Church, teaching and governing the same in all things.
I. B. ⟨p. 265⟩To the same purpose writeth Paul to the Colossians against the Traditions of men, and will-worship, not for Mr. Gs. cause, but because in so worshipping they held not the Head, vers. 19. which is Christ, King of his Church, teaching and gouerning the same in all things.
T. G. The Apostle expressly condemneth one sort of the superstitious he there speaketh of, because they were mere awill-worships, and humane inventions (wherein let Mr. B. take heed lest he be found faulty in denying unto Christians the lawful use of Gods creatures upon conceits merely superstitious, as those false teachers then did) that is, as Piscator well,