A01540:625
A just defence of certain passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and…A iust defence of certaine passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and…
A just defence of certain passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and use of lots, against such exceptions and oppositions as have been made thereunto to Mr. I.B. Wherein the insufficiency of his answers given to the arguments brought in defence of a lusorious lot is manifested; the imbecility of his arguments produced against the same further discovered; and the point it self in controversy more fully cleared; by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and author of the former treatise.A iust defence of certaine passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and vse of lots, against such exceptions and oppositions as have beene made thereunto to Mr. I.B. Wherein the insufficiencie of his answers giuen to the arguments brought in defence of a lusorious lot is manifested; the imbecillitie of his arguments produced against the same further discouered; and the point it selfe in controuersie more fully cleared; by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and author of the former treatise.
London: printed by John Haviland for Robert Bird, 1623London: printed by Iohn Haviland for Robert Bird, 1623
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
In the first he denieth this Proposition: That which may be used in other Civill affairs either weighty or less weighty, may be used also in disport. I reply by way of Induction▪ and require 1an instance to be given of any thing that may be used indifferently in the one and not in the other: that of an Oath will not serve.
In the first he denieth this Proposition: That which may be vsed in other Ciuill affaires either weighty or lesse weighty, may be vsed also in disport. I reply by way of Induction▪ and require 1an instance to be giuen of any thing that may be vsed indifferently in the one and not in the other: that of an Oath will not serue.
- 1[Greek or Hebrew]. Aristot. l. 2. c. 2.〈non-Latin alphabet〉. Aristot. l. 2. c. 2.
In the second Argument, the former shape, he denieth this Proposition, That which best sorteth with the nature of a Lot, may a Lot most lawfully be used unto: which for my part shall never be further proved.
In the second Argument, the former shape, he denieth this Proposition, That which best sorteth with the nature of a Lot, may a Lot most lawfully be vsed vnto: which for my part shall neuer be further proued.