A01540:637
A just defence of certain passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and…A iust defence of certaine passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and…
A just defence of certain passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and use of lots, against such exceptions and oppositions as have been made thereunto to Mr. I.B. Wherein the insufficiency of his answers given to the arguments brought in defence of a lusorious lot is manifested; the imbecility of his arguments produced against the same further discovered; and the point it self in controversy more fully cleared; by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and author of the former treatise.A iust defence of certaine passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and vse of lots, against such exceptions and oppositions as have beene made thereunto to Mr. I.B. Wherein the insufficiencie of his answers giuen to the arguments brought in defence of a lusorious lot is manifested; the imbecillitie of his arguments produced against the same further discouered; and the point it selfe in controuersie more fully cleared; by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and author of the former treatise.
London: printed by John Haviland for Robert Bird, 1623London: printed by Iohn Haviland for Robert Bird, 1623
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
In the third he must prove that that place, Prou. 18. 18. doth so restrain the use of a Lot to the ending of Controversies in serious matters, that to no other use it may be applied: to which purpose there is not a word here.
In the third he must proue that that place, Prou. 18. 18. doth so restraine the vse of a Lot to the ending of Controuersies in serious matters, that to no other vse it may be applied: to which purpose there is not a word here.
In the last, he must make good, if he will maintain his own Proposition, that nothing is lawful whereof there is no example in Gods word.
In the last, hee must make good, if hee will maintaine his owne Proposition, that nothing is lawfull whereof there is no example in Gods word.
Or if Mr. Easties, that nothing is by permission warrantable; or, Nothing warrantable but by precept.