A01972:1854
An exposition on the whole fifth chapter of S. Johns Gospel also notes on…An exposition on the vvhole fifth chapter of S. Iohns Gospell also notes on…
An exposition on the whole fifth chapter of S. Johns Gospel also notes on other choice places of Scripture, taken by a reverend divine, now with God, and found in his study after his death, written with his own hand ...An exposition on the vvhole fifth chapter of S. Iohns Gospell also notes on other choice places of Scripture, taken by a reuerend diuine, now with God, and found in his study after his death, written with his owne hand ...
London: printed by H. Lownes and R. Young for John Bartlett, 1630London: printed by H. Lownes and R. Young for Iohn Bartlett, 1630
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The ground of this opinion is, that they hold, that election is conditional: which Tenet is derogatory to glory, making his will and decree changeable, whereas he is immutable in both, and also deprives every faithful soul of a ground of main comfort: which otherwise doth rest in an holy security (opposed to fear and distrust) when once it perceives in it self the certain signs of Election.
The ground of this opinion is, that they hold, that election is conditionall: which Tenent is derogatory to glory, making his will and decree changeable, whereas he is immutable in both, and also depriues euery faithfull soule of a ground of maine comfort: which otherwise doth rest in an holy security (opposed to feare and distrust) when once it perceiues in it selfe the certaine signes of Election.
Object. 1 Exod. 32.32. and Rom. 9.3.
Obiect. 1 Exod. 32.32. and Rom. 9.3.
Answ. These holy men rapt with love and zeal, did only show what in their hearts they could wish to be done, not what could be done; it was Votum affectus, non Effectus.
Answ. These holy men rapt with loue and zeale, did onely shew what in their hearts they could wish to be done, not what could be done; it was Votum affectus, non Effectus.