A01972:458
An exposition on the whole fifth chapter of S. Johns Gospel also notes on…An exposition on the vvhole fifth chapter of S. Iohns Gospell also notes on…
An exposition on the whole fifth chapter of S. Johns Gospel also notes on other choice places of Scripture, taken by a reverend divine, now with God, and found in his study after his death, written with his own hand ...An exposition on the vvhole fifth chapter of S. Iohns Gospell also notes on other choice places of Scripture, taken by a reuerend diuine, now with God, and found in his study after his death, written with his owne hand ...
London: printed by H. Lownes and R. Young for John Bartlett, 1630London: printed by H. Lownes and R. Young for Iohn Bartlett, 1630
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Vers. 30. I can do nothing of mine own self, as I hear, I judge; and my judgement is just, because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father who hath sent me.
Vers. 30. I can doe nothing of mine owne selfe, as I heare, I iudge; and my iudgement is iust, because I seeke not mine owne will, but the will of the Father who hath sent me.
IN this Verse is laid down the condition of Christs judgement; to wit, that it is a just judgement; that he judgeth according to equity. This is confirmed by that communion that is between the Father and Him. The Argument is this: That which the Father doth, ordereth, and willeth, that is lawful and just. But the Father judgeth with me, he directeth my judgement, and consenteth thereunto. Therefore my judgement is just. The proposition is omitted, as granted of the Jews: the assumption and conclusion are here set down. The assumption in three points:
IN this Verse is laid downe the condition of Christs iudgement; to wit, that it is a iust iudgement; that hee iudgeth according to equity. This is confirmed by that communion that is betweene the Father and Him. The Argument is this: That which the Father doth, ordereth, and willeth, that is lawfull and iust. But the Father iudgeth with me, he directeth my iudgement, and consenteth thereunto. Therefore my iudgement is iust. The proposition is omitted, as granted of the Iewes: the assumption and conclusion are here set downe. The assumption in three points: