A01974:565
Gods three arrows plague, famine, sword, in three treatises. I. A plaster for the…Gods three arrovves plague, famine, svvord, in three treatises. I. A plaister for the…
Gods three arrows plague, famine, sword, in three treatises. I. A plaster for the plague. II. Dearths death. III. The Churches conquest over the sword. By William Gouge Doctor in Divinity, and preacher of Gods Word in Black-Friars, London.Gods three arrovves plague, famine, svvord, in three treatises. I. A plaister for the plague. II. Dearths death. III. The Churches conquest over the sword. By William Gouge Doctor in Divinity, and preacher of Gods Word in Black-Friers, London.
London: printed by George Miller for Edward Brewster, 1631
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
To take away all question, some say that this and other histories following to the end of this book, are not set down in just order of time: but, as memorable matters, are eadded after the former histories that depended one upon another.
To take away all question, some say that this and other histories following to the end of this booke, are not set downe in just order of time: but, as memorable matters, are eadded after the former histories that depended one upon another.
- ePer [Greek or Hebrew]. Pet. Mart. Comment. in hunc loc. Tremel, & Junius an notat. in 2 Sam. 24 1. utraque haec historia (aempe de Fame & Peste) per [Greek or Hebrew] temporum ultimoloco penitur.Per 〈non-Latin alphabet〉. Pet. Mart. Comment. in hunc loc. Tremel, & Iunius an notat. in 2 Sam. 24 1. utraque haec historia (aempe de Fame & Peste) per 〈non-Latin alphabet〉 temporum ultimoloco penitur.
It cannot be denied but that the Scripture sometimes so transposeth histories. Neither will I much contend about the transposing of these histories. No great inconvenience will follow thereupon. Yet the ground of all seemeth not to be very sound. For by many arguments it may be evinced that those forty years before mentioned, are not to be accounted the forty years of Davids reign.
It cannot be denied but that the Scripture sometimes so transposeth histories. Neither will I much contend about the transposing of these histories. No great inconvenience will follow thereupon. Yet the ground of all seemeth not to be very sound. For by many arguments it may be evinced that those forty yeares before mentioned, are not to be accounted the forty yeares of Davids raigne.