A02367:339
The sacrifice of thankfulness A sermon preached at Pauls Cross, the third of December,…The sacrifice of thankefulnesse A sermon preached at Pauls Crosse, the third of December,…
The sacrifice of thankfulness A sermon preached at Pauls Cross, the third of December, being the first Aduentuall Sunday, anno 1615. By Tho. Adams. Whereunto are annexed five other of his sermons preached in London, and else-where; never before printed. ...The sacrifice of thankefulnesse A sermon preached at Pauls Crosse, the third of December, being the first Aduentuall Sunday, anno 1615. By Tho. Adams. Whereunto are annexed fiue other of his sermons preached in London, and else-where; neuer before printed. ...
London: printed by Thomas Purfoot for Clement Knight, 1616
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Posse et nolle, nobile: That thou mayst harm and wilt not, is laus tua, thy praise: that thou wouldest and canst not, gratia Dei, is Gods providence. Haman would hang Mordecai and cannot: he is a villain in Hell for his intent. David, when he had Saul in the Cave, could hurt and would not: he is a Saint in Heaven. Shimei would, but can not kill (though rail on) David: David can, and will not kill Shimei. The hot Disciples would have Fire from Heaven to destroy the Samaritans, and could not: Christ could command it, and would not. How rare is a man of this disposition among us? If advantage hath thrust a Booty into his hands, the Lamb is in the Wolves Cave with more security. Plead what thou wilt, prostrate thy own innocence, aggravate the Oppressors cruelty: he answers as Aesop's Wolfe answered the Lamb; Thy Cause is better then mine, but my Teeth are better then thine; I will eat thee. And this is a shrewd invincible argument, when the cause must be tried out by the Teeth. Pactum non pactum est,1 non pactum pactum est; quicquid illis lubet: Bargain or not bargain; the Law must be on their sides: Nemo potentes tutus potest aggred•: Hee comes to his cost,2 that comes to complain against them.
Posse et nolle, nobile: That thou mayst harme and wilt not, is laus tua, thy prayse: that thou wouldest and canst not, gratia Dei, is Gods prouidence. Haman would hang Mordecai and cannot: hee is a villaine in Hell for his intent. Dauid, when hee had Saul in the Caue, could hurt and would not: hee is a Saint in Heauen. Shimei would, but can not kill (though rayle on) Dauid: Dauid can, and will not kill Shimei. The hote Disciples would haue Fire from Heauen to destroy the Samaritans, and could not: Christ could commaund it, and would not. How rare is a man of this disposition among vs? If aduantage hath thrust a Bootie into his hands, the Lambe is in the Wolues Caue with more securitie. Plead what thou wilt, prostrate thy owne innocence, aggrauate the Oppressors crueltie: hee answeres as Esopes Wolfe answered the Lambe; Thy Cause is better then mine, but my Teeth are better then thine; I will eate thee. Aud this is a shrewd inuincible argument, when the cause must be tryed out by the Teeth. Pactum non pactum est,1