A04468:1223
A defence of the Apology of the Church of England containing an answer to…A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to…
A defence of the Apology of the Church of England containing an answer to a certain book lately set forth by M. Harding, and entitled, A confutation of &c. By John Jewel Bishop of Salisbury.A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to a certaine booke lately set foorthe by M. Hardinge, and entituled, A confutation of &c. By Iohn Iewel Bishop of Sarisburie.
Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the sign of the Elephant, by Henry Wykes, Anno 1567. 27. OctobrisImprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Elephante, by Henry VVykes, Anno 1567. 27. Octobris
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Briefly, M. Hardinges own Scholastical Doctors Confess, that the Power of the Apostles was One, and Equal. But they say, that the whole multitude of the Church was committed only unto Peter: and not likewise to any other: and that therein only standeth all the difference.1 Heruaeus saith, Quamuis Apostoli eandem habuerint à Christo, & aequalem potestatem Clavium, & Jurisdictionis, ⟨p. 163⟩tamen Jurisdictionem, 2sivè Materiam subiectam, non habuit, nisi Petrus, & cui eam Petrus committere voluit: Notwithstanding the Apostles received of Christ equal Power of the Keys, and Jurisdiction, yet the Jurisdiction, or matter wherein to use their Power, none had, but Only Peter, and to whom so ever Peter would commit the same. And thus he imagineth, that all the Apostles, saving Only Peter, had Keys given them, but no House to Open: and Jurisdiction, but no people to govern.
Briefly, M. Hardinges owne Scholastical Doctours Confesse, that the Power of the Apostles was One, and Equal. But they saye, that the whole multitude of the Churche was committed onely vnto Peter: and not likewise to any other: and that therein onely standeth al the difference.1 Heruaeus saithe, Quamuis Apostoli eandem habuerint à Christo, & aequalem potestatem Clauium, & Iurisdictionis, ⟨p. 163⟩tamen Iurisdictionem, 2siuè Materiam subiectam, non habuit, nisi Petrus, & cui eam Petrus committere voluit: Notwithstandinge the Apostles receiued of Christe equal Povver of the Keies, and Iurisdiction, yet the Iurisdiction, or mater wherein to vse their Power, none had, but Onely Peter, and to whome so euer Peter woulde commit the same. And thus he imagineth, that al the Apostles, sauinge Onely Peter, had Keies geuen them, but no House to Open: and Iurisdiction, but no people to gouerne.
- 1