A04468:1652
A defence of the Apology of the Church of England containing an answer to…A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to…
A defence of the Apology of the Church of England containing an answer to a certain book lately set forth by M. Harding, and entitled, A confutation of &c. By John Jewel Bishop of Salisbury.A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to a certaine booke lately set foorthe by M. Hardinge, and entituled, A confutation of &c. By Iohn Iewel Bishop of Sarisburie.
Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the sign of the Elephant, by Henry Wykes, Anno 1567. 27. OctobrisImprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Elephante, by Henry VVykes, Anno 1567. 27. Octobris
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The B. of Salisbury.
The B. of Sarisburie.
Where nothing is answered, it were not amiss, to reply nothing. If M. Harding can only vouchsafe, to call us slanderous Reporters, • unshamefast ⟨p. 229⟩Liars:1 and the Lords Supper a Schismatical, Mutable, polluted Communion, it is sufficient: the matter needeth no farther proof. To this whole matter, M. Harding saith, He hath sufficiently answered M. Jewel. He hath answered, I grant: but how sufficiently, the matter it self will declare. How be it, he may not in any wise forget, that in the same two short Treaties to M. Jewel, containing only two and forty little leaves of Paper, he hath sent us over, and published threescore and four notable, and great Untruths: whereof, I think, he hath no great cause so much to glory.
Where nothinge is answeared, it were not amisse, to replie nothinge. If M. Hardinge can onely vouchesaue, to calle vs sclaund•rous Reporters, • vnshamefast ⟨p. 229⟩Liers:1 and the Lordes Supper a Schismatical, Mutable, pollutted Communion, it is sufficient: the mater needeth no farther proufe. To this whole matter, M. Hardinge saithe, He hath sufficiently answeared M. Iewel. He hath answeared, I graunte: but how sufficiently, the mater it selfe wil declare. How be it, he maie not in any wise forgeate, that in the same twoo shorte Treaties to M. Jewel, conteininge onely twoo and fourtie litle leaues of Paper, he hath sente vs ouer, and published threescore and foure notable, and greate Vntruthes: whereof, I thinke, he hath no greate cause so mutche to glorie.