A04468:1757
A defence of the Apology of the Church of England containing an answer to…A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to…
A defence of the Apology of the Church of England containing an answer to a certain book lately set forth by M. Harding, and entitled, A confutation of &c. By John Jewel Bishop of Salisbury.A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to a certaine booke lately set foorthe by M. Hardinge, and entituled, A confutation of &c. By Iohn Iewel Bishop of Sarisburie.
Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the sign of the Elephant, by Henry Wykes, Anno 1567. 27. OctobrisImprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Elephante, by Henry VVykes, Anno 1567. 27. Octobris
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Thus the Bread remaineth: and thus it is changed. It remaineth in Substance: but it is changed in Mystery.
Thus the Breade remaineth: and thus it is changed. It remaineth in Substance: but it is changed in Mysterie.
But M. Harding heavily presseth these Words, Mutantur in Aliud: that is, ⟨p. 248⟩saith he,1 into a thing of an other Substance. For by this phrase is signified a Substantial changing, which aptly is called Transubstantiation. I will not here use your courteous eloquence, M. Harding: nor say unto you, as you say to others, I pray you, good Sir: but thus I say, I pray you, M. Harding, who gave you this rule? who taught you this Lesson? De Coelo est, an ex Hominibus? Came it from Heaven, or is it of Men? Have the Holy Fathers thus taught you, or is it only you own fantasy? What Grammar, What Logic, What Philosophy, What Divinity ever told you, that, Aliud, evermore signifieth a thing of an other Substance? If ye have an Author, why come you without him? If it be only of your self, why should we believe you?
But M. Hardinge heauily presseth these Woordes, Mutantur in Aliud: that is, ⟨p. 248⟩saithe he,1 into a thinge of an other Substance. For by this phrase is signified a Substantial changinge, whiche aptely is called Transubstantiation. I will not here vse your courteous eloquence, M. Hardinge: nor saie vnto you, as you saie to others, I praie you, good Sir: but thus I saie, I praie you, M. Hardinge, who gaue you this rule? who taught you this Lesson? De Coelo est, an ex Hominibus? Came it from Heauen, or is it of Menne? Haue the Holy Fathers thus taught you, or is it onely you owne fantasie? What Grammar, What Logique, What Philosophie, What Diuinitie euer tolde you, that, Aliud, euermore signifieth a thinge of an other Substance? If ye haue an Authour, why comme you without him? If it be onely of your selfe, why should wée beléeue you?