A04468:1781
A defence of the Apology of the Church of England containing an answer to…A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to…
A defence of the Apology of the Church of England containing an answer to a certain book lately set forth by M. Harding, and entitled, A confutation of &c. By John Jewel Bishop of Salisbury.A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to a certaine booke lately set foorthe by M. Hardinge, and entituled, A confutation of &c. By Iohn Iewel Bishop of Sarisburie.
Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the sign of the Elephant, by Henry Wykes, Anno 1567. 27. OctobrisImprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Elephante, by Henry VVykes, Anno 1567. 27. Octobris
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
But why dealeth he so doubly? Wherefore dissembleth he the words of Gelasius, that immediately in the same sentence went before? For Gelasius him self so clearly, and plainly expoundeth his own mind, as no Lovanian Doctor can do it better. 1Thus he saithe, Non desinit esse Substantia Panis, vel Natura Vini. Et certè Imago. & similitudo Corporis, & Sanguinis Christi in Actione Mysteriorum celebratur: There leaveth not to be the Substance of Bread, or the Nature of Wine. And in deed the Image, or Representation, ⟨p. 252⟩and likeness of the Body, and Blood of Christ is published in the Ministration of the Mysteries. And again in the words next immediately following, Sacramenta transeunt in Divinam, Spiritu Sancto perficiente, Substantiam: permanent tamen in suae proprietate Naturae: The Sacraments, by the working of the Holy Ghost, pass into a Divine Substance: yet notwithstanding, they remain still in the property of their own Nature.
But why dealeth he so doubly? Wherefore dissembleth he the woordes of Gelasius, that immediatly in the same sentence wente before? For Gelasius him selfe so clearely, and plainely expoundeth his owne minde, as no Louanian Doctour can doo it better. 1Thus he saithe, Non desinit esse Substantia Panis, vel Natura Vini. Et certè Imago. & similitudo Corporis, & Sanguinis Christi in Actione Mysteriorum celebratur: There leaueth not to be the Substance of Breade, or the Nature of VVine. And in deede the Image, or Representation, ⟨p. 252⟩and likenesse of the Body, and Bloude of Christe is published in the Ministration of the Mysteries. And againe in the woordes nexte immediately folowinge, Sacramenta transeunt in Diuinam, Spiritu Sancto perficiente, Substantiam: permanent tamen in suae proprietate Naturae: The Sacramentes, by the woorkinge of the Holy Ghoste, passe into a Diuine Substance: yet notwithstandinge, they remaine stil in the propertie of their ovvne Nature.
- 1Getasius contra Eutychetem.