A04468:1864
A defence of the Apology of the Church of England containing an answer to…A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to…
A defence of the Apology of the Church of England containing an answer to a certain book lately set forth by M. Harding, and entitled, A confutation of &c. By John Jewel Bishop of Salisbury.A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to a certaine booke lately set foorthe by M. Hardinge, and entituled, A confutation of &c. By Iohn Iewel Bishop of Sarisburie.
Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the sign of the Elephant, by Henry Wykes, Anno 1567. 27. OctobrisImprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Elephante, by Henry VVykes, Anno 1567. 27. Octobris
Part 2 › The Apology. › The B. of Salisbury.Part 2 › The Apologie. › The B. of Sarisburie.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Again S. 1Augustine saithe, Dominus per Vini Sacramentum, commendat Sanguinem suum. Quid enim aliud, Novum Vinum, nisi Immortalitatem renovandorum Corporum intelligere debemus? Our Lord by the Sacrament (not of Forms, or Accidents, but ) of Wine, commendeth unto us his Blood. For what other thing may we understand the New Wine to be, but the Immortality of our Bodies, that shall be renewed? S. Chrysostom saithe, Cùm Dominus hoc Mysterium traderer, Vinum tradidit.2 Etiam post Resurrectionem sine Mysterijs in simplici mensa Vino usus est. Ex genimine, ait, Vitis: quae certè Vinum, non Aquam producit: Our Lord, when he delivered this Mystery, delivered (not Accidents, but) Wine. And after his Resurrection, being at a plain table without the Mysteries, he used Wine. For so he saith, Of the fruit of the Vine: Which vine surely beareth, not Water,3 but Wine. M. Harding saith: Who so ever expoundeth these words as spoken of y• Mysteries, belieth both the Holy Fathers, and Christ him self. S. Chrysostom expoundeth the same words, as spoken of the Mysteries, and to that purpose applieth the words of Christ. Therefore, by M. Hardinges Conclusion, he belieth both the Holy Fathers, and Christ him self.
Againe S. 1Augustine saithe, Dominus per Vini Sacramentum, commendat Sanguinem suum. Quid enim aliud, Nouum Vinum, nisi Immortalitatem renouandorum Corporum intelligere debemus? Our Lorde by the Sacramente (not of Fourmes, or Accidentes, but ) of VVine, commendeth vnto vs his Bloude. For what other thinge maie wee vnderstande the Nevve VVine to be, but the Immortalitie of our Bodyes, that shalbe reuewed? S. Chrysostome saithe, Cùm Dominus hoc Mysterium traderer, Vinum tradidit.2 Etiam post Resurrectionem sine Mysterijs in simplici mensa Vino vsus est. Ex genimine, ait, Vitis: quae certè Vinum, non Aquam producit: Our Lorde, when he deliuered this Mysterie, deliuered (not Accidentes, but) VVine. And after his Resurrection, being at a plaine table without the Mysteries, he vsed VVine. For so he saithe, Of the fruite of the Vine: VVhiche vine surely beareth, not VVater,