A04468:2842
A defence of the Apology of the Church of England containing an answer to…A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to…
A defence of the Apology of the Church of England containing an answer to a certain book lately set forth by M. Harding, and entitled, A confutation of &c. By John Jewel Bishop of Salisbury.A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to a certaine booke lately set foorthe by M. Hardinge, and entituled, A confutation of &c. By Iohn Iewel Bishop of Sarisburie.
Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the sign of the Elephant, by Henry Wykes, Anno 1567. 27. OctobrisImprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Elephante, by Henry VVykes, Anno 1567. 27. Octobris
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
But Gregory, 1ye say, being Pope, governed the whole Church of God. For he complaineth, that Maximus was made Bishop of Salonae in Illyrico without his allowance. This Authority is answered in my Former Reply. But how holdeth this Argument, M. Harding? Gregory complaineth, that Maximus was made Bishop of Salonae in Illyrico without his allowance: Ergo, Gregory ruled the whole Church?
But Gregorie, 1ye saie, beinge Pope, gouerned the whole Churche of God. For he complaineth, that Maximus was made Bishop of Salonae in Illyrico without his allowance. This Authoritie is answered in my Former Replie. But how holdeth this Argument, M. Hardinge? Gregorie complaineth, that Maximus vvas made Bishop of Salonae in Illyrico vvithout his allovvance: Ergo, Gregorie ruled the vvhole Churche?
- 1Gregor. Lib. 4. Epist. 34. Artic. 4. Diu. 25.
What School will allow you such Conclusions? It is known, that in the Nicene Council the charge of the whole Church was committed to three Principal Patriarchs, whereof the Patriarch of Rome was the First: the Second of Alexandria: the Third of Antioch. And each of these three was limited severally to his own peculiar portion. 1Nilus a Greek Writer saith, Cùm aliae Regiones assignatae sint Romano, aliae Alexandrino, aliae Constantinopolitano, non magis hi sub illo sunt, quam ille sub hisce: For ás much as certain Countries are limited to the Bishop of Rome: certain to the Bishop of Alexandria: and certain to the Bishop of Constantinople, they are now no more under him, then he under them.
What Schole wil allowe you sutche Conclusions? It is knowen, that in the Nicene Councel the charge of the whole Churche was committed to thrée Principal Patriarkes, whereof the Patriarke of Rome was the Firste: the Seconde of Alexandria: the Thirde of Antioche. And eche of these thrée was limited seuerally to his owne peculiare portion.