A04468:3145
A defence of the Apology of the Church of England containing an answer to…A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to…
A defence of the Apology of the Church of England containing an answer to a certain book lately set forth by M. Harding, and entitled, A confutation of &c. By John Jewel Bishop of Salisbury.A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to a certaine booke lately set foorthe by M. Hardinge, and entituled, A confutation of &c. By Iohn Iewel Bishop of Sarisburie.
Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the sign of the Elephant, by Henry Wykes, Anno 1567. 27. OctobrisImprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Elephante, by Henry VVykes, Anno 1567. 27. Octobris
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The objection of difference, that ye make between S. James, and S. Paul, (S. Augustine saith) is made by them y• understand, neither S. James, 1nor S. Paul, The whole force thereof is answered before. It is easy to see, that S. Paul speaketh of one Kind of Works, and S. James of an other: & again, S. Paul of one kind of Justification, and S. James of an other. Therefore this difference is soon avoided. Certainly we deny neither S. Paul, nor S. James: nor think, the one of them to be contrary to the other.
The obiection of difference, that ye make bitwéene S. Iames, and S. Paule, (S. Augustine saithe) is made by thē y• vnderstand, neither S. Iames, 1nor S. Paule, The whole force thereof is answeared before. It is easy to sée, that S. Paule speaketh of one Kinde of VVoorkes, and S. Iames of an other: & againe, S. Paule of one kinde of Iustification, and S. Iames of an other. Therefore this difference is soone auoided. Certainely wee denie neither S. Paule, nor S. Iames: nor thinke, the one of them to be contrarie to the other.
- 1Augu. in Lib. 83. quaestionū q. 76. Part. 1. Ca. 10. Divi. 1.Augu. in Lib. 83. quaestionū q. 76. Parte. 1. Ca. 10. Diui. 1.
Touching the Words of Christ, that ye have alleged out of S. John, it appeareth, ye were in some baste,1 and therefore were fain to take, that came first to hand. For I will not say, M. Harding, what Doctor, or Father, but, what drift, or discretion of Common sense ever taught you to reason thus? Christ saith, He that Eateth of this Bread shall live for ever: Ergo, The people must receive the Communion under One kind.