A04468:4282
A defence of the Apology of the Church of England containing an answer to…A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to…
A defence of the Apology of the Church of England containing an answer to a certain book lately set forth by M. Harding, and entitled, A confutation of &c. By John Jewel Bishop of Salisbury.A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to a certaine booke lately set foorthe by M. Hardinge, and entituled, A confutation of &c. By Iohn Iewel Bishop of Sarisburie.
Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the sign of the Elephant, by Henry Wykes, Anno 1567. 27. OctobrisImprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Elephante, by Henry VVykes, Anno 1567. 27. Octobris
Part 6 › The Apology, Cap. 11. Division. 2.Part 6 › The Apologie, Cap. 11. Diuision. 2.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The Apology, Cap. 11. Division. 2.
The Apologie, Cap. 11. Diuision. 2.
For besides that, a Christian Prince hath the charge of Both Tables committed to him by God, to the end he may understand, that, not Temporal matters only, but also Religious, and Ecclesiastical Causes pertain to his office, &c.
For besides that, a Christian Prince hath the charge of Bothe Tables committed to him by God, to the ende he maie vnderstande, that, not Temporal maters onely, but also Religious, and Ecclesiastical Causes perteine to his office, &c.
M. Harding.
M. Hardinge.
You will prove that Ecclesiastical causes pertain to a Kings of fice, because he hath the charge of both tables. If you mean that a King is bound to keep both tables of the law, so is also every private man. And yet, as no private man is supreme head of the Church by keeping them, so neither the King is proved thereby the‡