A04468:4312
A defence of the Apology of the Church of England containing an answer to…A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to…
A defence of the Apology of the Church of England containing an answer to a certain book lately set forth by M. Harding, and entitled, A confutation of &c. By John Jewel Bishop of Salisbury.A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to a certaine booke lately set foorthe by M. Hardinge, and entituled, A confutation of &c. By Iohn Iewel Bishop of Sarisburie.
Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the sign of the Elephant, by Henry Wykes, Anno 1567. 27. OctobrisImprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Elephante, by Henry VVykes, Anno 1567. 27. Octobris
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Your own Hugo cardinalis saith, 1Accipiet exemplar à Sacerdotibus: non à quibussibet, sed à bonis: Ubi nihil fucatum est: nihil corruptum: He shall take his Copy of y• Priests: not of every Priest, what so ever: but of the good: that in the same Copy there be nothing, neither coloured, nor corrupted.
Your owne Hugo cardinalis saithe, 1Accipiet exemplar à Sacerdotibus: non à quibussibet, sed à bonis: Vbi nihil fucatum est: nihil corruptum: He shal take his Copie of y• Priestes: not of euery Prieste, what so euer: but of the good: that in the same Copie there be nothing, neither coloured, nor corrupted.
- 1Hugo in Deut. Cap. 17.Hugo in Deute. Cap. 17.
Al this, M. Harding, will hardly prove your strange Conclusion, that the ⟨p. 649⟩Priest was Superior to the King: 1It seemeth much better to prove the contrary, that the Priest was the Kings Inferior, and his Subject, and his Clerk of Records, as being appointed to keep his Books. So S. Augustine saith,2 the Jews this day keep the very true Books of the Scriptures: Al be it, not for their own use, but only for ours. And therefore, he saith, they be, not our Superiors, but our Servants.
Al this, M. Hardinge, wil hardely proue your strange Conclusion, that the