A04468:752
A defence of the Apology of the Church of England containing an answer to…A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to…
A defence of the Apology of the Church of England containing an answer to a certain book lately set forth by M. Harding, and entitled, A confutation of &c. By John Jewel Bishop of Salisbury.A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to a certaine booke lately set foorthe by M. Hardinge, and entituled, A confutation of &c. By Iohn Iewel Bishop of Sarisburie.
Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the sign of the Elephant, by Henry Wykes, Anno 1567. 27. OctobrisImprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Elephante, by Henry VVykes, Anno 1567. 27. Octobris
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Likewise again he saith, Ne quisquam Spiritum Sanctum negaret Deum, continuò sequutus ait, Glorificate, & portate Deum in Corpore vestro: Least any man should deny, 1that the Holy Ghost is God, Paul added immediately these words: Glorify you therefore, and bear God in your Body. Here have we S. Augustine's Yea, and M. Hardinges Nay. S. Augustine assureth us, he hath Scriptures, to prove the Godhead of the Holy Ghost: M. Harding saith, we are sure, he hath none at all. Judge thou now, Gentle Reader, whether of these Doctors thou wilt believe.
Likewise againe he saith, Ne quisquam Spiritum Sanctum negaret Deum, continuò sequutus ait, Glorificate, & portate Deum in Corpore vestro: Least any man should denie, 1that the Holy Ghost is God, Paule added immediately these woordes: Glorifie you therefore, and beare God in your Body. Here haue wée S. Augustines Yea, and M. Hardinges Nay. S. Augustine assureth vs, he hath Scriptures, to proue the Godhed of the Holy Ghoste: M. Hardinge saithe, wée are sure, he hath none at al. Iudge thou nowe, Gentle Reader, whether of these Doctours thou wilt beléeue.
- 1Augustin. Episto. 174.
But what a vain vanity, and folly is this? will M. Harding have us believe, that God cannot be God, onlesse he be allowed by the Church of Rome, and by the Pope? Then are we come again to that, the Tertullian writeth merrily of the Heathens: Nisi Homini Deus placuerit, 1Deus non erit: Homo jam Deo propitius esse debebit: Onlesse God please Man well (though he be God) he shall be no God. And so now Man must be friendly, and favourable unto God.
But what a vaine vanitie, and folie is this? wil M. Hardinge haue vs beléeue, that God cannot be God, onlesse he be allowed by the Churche of Rome, and by the Pope? Then are wée come againe to that, ye Tertullian writeth merily of the Heathens: Nisi Homini Deus placuerit,