A04472:598
An expositio[n] upon the two epistles of the apostle S. Paul to the Thessalonians…An expositio[n] vpon the two epistles of the apostle S. Paul to the Thessalonians…
An expositio[n] upon the two epistles of the apostle S. Paul to the Thessalonians by the reverend Father John Jewel ... ; whereunto is adjoined a very necessary table of the principal matters contained in this exposition.An expositio[n] vpon the two epistles of the apostle S. Paul to the Thessalonians by the reuerend Father Iohn Ievvel ... ; vvhereunto is adioined a very necessarie table of the principal matters contained in this exposition.
London: printed by Ralfe Newberie, 1584
¶ The Second Epistle of the Apostle Saint Paul to the Thessalonians. › Chapter 2
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Why is it said, In ijs quae vult est ei pro ratione 1voluntas, nec est qui dicat illi, domine cur it a facis? In such things as he willeth, his will standeth in stead of reason, neither may any man say unto him, O sir, why do ye this? but, because he is lawless. Why is it said of him, although 2all the world would judge in any matter against the Pope, yet it seemeth we ought to stand to the judgement of the Pope. For he seemeth to have all laws in the chest of his bosom, but because he is [Greek or Hebrew] that lawless man? Why is it, notwithstanding the Pope 3draw innumerable companies of people by heaps with him into hell, that yet no mortal man may once dare reprove him, but because ⟨p. 336⟩he is that lawless man?
Why is it saide, In ijs quae vult est ei pro ratione 1voluntas, nec est qui dicat illi, domine cur it a facis? In such thinges as he willeth, his wil standeth in steede of reason, neither may any man say vnto him, O sir, why doe ye this? but, because he is lawlesse. Why is it said of him, although 2al the world would iudge in anie matter against the Pope, yet it séemeth we ought to stande to the iudgement of the Pope. For he séemeth to haue al lawes in the chest of his bosome, but because he is 〈non-Latin alphabet〉 that lawlesse man? Why is it, notwithstanding the Pope 3drawe innumerable companies of people by heapes with him into hel, that yet no mortall man may once dare reproue him, but because ⟨p. 336⟩he is that lawelesse man?
- 1