A04474:1007
A reply unto M. Hardinges answerA replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare
A reply unto M. Hardinges answer by perusing whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weak, and unstable grounds of the Romaine religion, which of late hath been accounted Catholic. By John Jewel Bishop of Salisbury.A replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare by perusinge whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weake, and vnstable groundes of the Romaine religion, whiche of late hath beene accompted Catholique. By Iohn Iewel Bishoppe of Sarisburie.
Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the sign of the Black Oliphant, by Henry Wykes, Anno. 1565Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Blacke Oliphante, by Henry VVykes, Anno. 1565
Article 2 › The B. of Salisbury.Article 2 › The B. of Sarisburie.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
He will say, there is mention made but only of the Cup. Therefore the Child received not the other kind. This guess is over slender: yet is it an ordinary argument with M. Harding. But it seemeth, he doth not well consider the inconvenience, that thereof may follow. For so may he as well conclude, that the Priest him self, and the Deacons, and the whole people, received only of the Cup. For there is no mention at all made of the other portion.
He wil say, there is mention made but onely of the Cuppe. Therefore the Childe receiued not the other kinde. This gheasse is ouer s•lender: yet is it an ordinary argument with M. Hardinge. But it séemeth, he dothe not wel consider the inconuenience, that thereof may followe. For so may he as wel conclude, that the Prieste him selfe, and the Deacons, and the whole people, receiued onely of the Cuppe. For there is no mention at al made of the other portion.
If the Bread had been offered to the child, she would as well have refused that, as she did the Cup. This is an other guess without any necessary sequel. This effect followed when God would have it: of whose doings we can give no reason.
If the Breade had beene offred to the childe, she woulde as wel haue refused that, as she did the Cuppe. This is an other gheasse without any necessary sequele. This effect followed when God would haue it: of whose dooinges we canne geue no reason.
Lyra, and Teutonicus, lived at the least thirteen hundred years after Christ, wherefore their authority in this case must needs seem the less. Yet, for ought that I can see, Lyra is untruly alleged, as writing to an other purpose.