A04474:1052
A reply unto M. Hardinges answerA replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare
A reply unto M. Hardinges answer by perusing whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weak, and unstable grounds of the Romaine religion, which of late hath been accounted Catholic. By John Jewel Bishop of Salisbury.A replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare by perusinge whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weake, and vnstable groundes of the Romaine religion, whiche of late hath beene accompted Catholique. By Iohn Iewel Bishoppe of Sarisburie.
Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the sign of the Black Oliphant, by Henry Wykes, Anno. 1565Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Blacke Oliphante, by Henry VVykes, Anno. 1565
Article 2 › The B. of Salisbury.Article 2 › The B. of Sarisburie.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
But the Gloss saith notwithstanding, These Priests Consecrated both the Body and the Blood, and received the Body, and abstained from the Blood. Here would I •aine learn of D. Cole, what then became of the Cup. The Priest drank it ⟨p. 147⟩not: That is certain: for the Gloss saith so. Again, the people drank it not: for so saith the Gloss also: and be it true, or false, it must be defended.
But the Glose saithe notwithstandinge, These Priestes Consecrated bothe the Bodie and the Bloude, and receiued the Bodie, and absteined from the Bloude. Here would I •aine learne of D. Cole, what then became of the Cuppe. The Prieste dranke it ⟨p. 147⟩not: That is certaine: for the Glose saithe so. Againe, the people dranke it not: for so saithe the Glose also: and be it true, or false, it must be defended.
Then must it needs follow, that Christs Blood was Consecrate, to be cast away. D. Cole might have foreseen, that this Gloss would soon be taken against him self. Now let us see of this very self Gloss, what may be concluded of our side. The Sacrament of Christs Blood was not thrown away: The Priest received it not. Ergo, It followeth of very fine force, it was received by the people. Thus D. Cole seeking to prove, that the people received not in Both Kinds, him self unawares necessarily proveth, that the people received in Both Kinds.
Then must it needes follow, that Christes Bloud was Consecrate, to be cast awaye. D. Cole might haue foreséene, that this Glose woulde soone be taken against him selfe. Now let vs see of this very selfe Glose, what may be concluded of our side. The Sacrament of Christes Bloud was not throwen away: The Priest receiued it not. Ergo, It followeth of very fine force, it was receiued by the people. Thus D. Cole seeking to prooue, that the people receiued not in Both Kindes, him selfe vnawares necessarily prooueth, that the people receiued in Both Kindes.