A04474:1053
A reply unto M. Hardinges answerA replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare
A reply unto M. Hardinges answer by perusing whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weak, and unstable grounds of the Romaine religion, which of late hath been accounted Catholic. By John Jewel Bishop of Salisbury.A replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare by perusinge whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weake, and vnstable groundes of the Romaine religion, whiche of late hath beene accompted Catholique. By Iohn Iewel Bishoppe of Sarisburie.
Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the sign of the Black Oliphant, by Henry Wykes, Anno. 1565Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Blacke Oliphante, by Henry VVykes, Anno. 1565
Article 2 › The B. of Salisbury.Article 2 › The B. of Sarisburie.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Then must it needs follow, that Christs Blood was Consecrate, to be cast away. D. Cole might have foreseen, that this Gloss would soon be taken against him self. Now let us see of this very self Gloss, what may be concluded of our side. The Sacrament of Christs Blood was not thrown away: The Priest received it not. Ergo, It followeth of very fine force, it was received by the people. Thus D. Cole seeking to prove, that the people received not in Both Kinds, him self unawares necessarily proveth, that the people received in Both Kinds.
Then must it needes follow, that Christes Bloud was Consecrate, to be cast awaye. D. Cole might haue foreséene, that this Glose woulde soone be taken against him selfe. Now let vs see of this very selfe Glose, what may be concluded of our side. The Sacrament of Christes Bloud was not throwen away: The Priest receiued it not. Ergo, It followeth of very fine force, it was receiued by the people. Thus D. Cole seeking to prooue, that the people receiued not in Both Kindes, him selfe vnawares necessarily prooueth, that the people receiued in Both Kindes.
Wherefore M. Hardinges conjecture carrieth more substance of truth. For the very story, and conference of time, will soon give the advised Reader to understand, that Gelasius wrote this decree against the Manichees.
Wherefore M. Hardinges coniecture carrieth more substance of truth. For the very story, and conference of time, wil soone geue the aduised Reader to vnderstande, that Gelasius wrote this decrée against the Manichees.
Thus much therefore hath M. Harding gotten hereby,1 that now it appeareth, that the first authors of his half Communion were a sort of Heretics. They held that Christ never received Flesh of the Blessed Virgin, neither was borne, nor suffered, nor died, nor arose again. Which errors are manifestly convinced by the Sacraments. For they are Sacraments of Christs Body & Blood: therefore who so receiveth the same, confesseth thereby, that Christ of the Virgin received both Body and Blood. So saith S. Chrysostom,