A04474:1172
A reply unto M. Hardinges answerA replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare
A reply unto M. Hardinges answer by perusing whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weak, and unstable grounds of the Romaine religion, which of late hath been accounted Catholic. By John Jewel Bishop of Salisbury.A replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare by perusinge whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weake, and vnstable groundes of the Romaine religion, whiche of late hath beene accompted Catholique. By Iohn Iewel Bishoppe of Sarisburie.
Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the sign of the Black Oliphant, by Henry Wykes, Anno. 1565Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Blacke Oliphante, by Henry VVykes, Anno. 1565
Article 3 › The B. of Salisbury.Article 3 › The B. of Sarisburie.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The people of Lycaonia spake unto Paul,1 and Barnabas, Lycaonicè: Ergo, saith M. Harding, they spake no Greek. But what if S. Luke had said, they spake Jonicè, Aeolic•, or Doric, which tongues were adjoining fast upon Lycaonia, would he therefore conclude, they spake no Greek? Verily if a man by way of contention would say, the Lycaonical tongue was a corruption, or difference of the Greek tongue, and not a several tongue of it self, M. Harding should have much a do to prove the contrary. Doubtless, they worshipped Jupiter, and Mercury, that were the Gods of the Greeks: and had the Greek Sacrifice, as it manifestly appeareth by the words of S. Luke: and it may be credibly gathered, that Paul, and Barnabas spake to them in Greek. How be it, whether it were so, or otherwise, saving that M. Harding maketh the matter so c•rtaine, it importeth ⟨p. 165⟩nothing.
The people of Lycaonia spake vnto Paule,1 and Barnabas, Lycaonicè: Ergo, saithe M. Hardinge, they spake no Greeke. But what if S. Luke had saide, they spake Ionicè, Aeolic•, or Doric•, whiche tongues were adioininge fast vpon Lycaonia, would he therefore conclude, they sapke no Greeke? Uerely if a man by way of contention woulde say, the Lycaonical tongue was a corruption, or difference of the Gréeke tongue, and not a seueral tongue of it selfe, M. Hardinge shoulde haue muche a doo to prooue the contrary. Doubtlesse, they woorshipped Iuppiter, and Mercurie, that were the Goddes of the Gréekes: and had the Gréeke Sacrifice, as it manifestly appeareth by the woordes of S. Luke: and it may be credibly geathered, that Paule, and Barnabas spake to them in Gréeke. How be it, whether it were so, or otherwise, sauinge that M. Hardinge maketh the mater so c•rtaine, it improteth ⟨p. 165⟩nothinge.