A04474:1609
A reply unto M. Hardinges answerA replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare
A reply unto M. Hardinges answer by perusing whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weak, and unstable grounds of the Romaine religion, which of late hath been accounted Catholic. By John Jewel Bishop of Salisbury.A replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare by perusinge whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weake, and vnstable groundes of the Romaine religion, whiche of late hath beene accompted Catholique. By Iohn Iewel Bishoppe of Sarisburie.
Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the sign of the Black Oliphant, by Henry Wykes, Anno. 1565Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Blacke Oliphante, by Henry VVykes, Anno. 1565
Article 4 › The B. of Salisbury.Article 4 › The B. of Sarisburie.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
As for M. Hardinges Athanasius,1 his tale is so simple, that it will soon bewray it self.2 For, as I noted before, he writeth unto Marcus the Bishop of Rome, of the burning of the Books: and yet Athanasius him self certainly knew, that Marcus was dead, at the least nine years before that burning happened.
As for M. Hardinges Athanasius,1 his tale is so simple, that it wil soone bewray it selfe.2 For, as I noted before, he writeth vnto Marcus the Bishop of Rome, of the burninge of the Bookes: and yet Athanasius him selfe certainely knewe, that Marcus was deade, at the least nine yéeres before that burninge happened.
- 1Manifest forgeryManifeste forgerie
- 2Athanasius in Epist. ad Orthodoxos. Socrates li. 2. cap. 14.
Even so, the vain forger of the Emperor Constantine's great Dotation, imagineth him to Decree, that the Bishop of Constantinople should be subject unto the See of Rome. And yet neither was the City of Constantinople at that time built, nor any such name yet known in the world, nor any Bishopric there erected. A man might saye, Non satis commodè divisa sunt temporibus tibi Dave haec.
Euen so, the vaine forger of the Emperour Constantines greate Dotation, imagineth him to Decrée, that the Bishop of Constantinople shoulde be subiecte vnto the See of Rome. And yet neither was the Citie of Constantinople at that time builte, nor any suche name yet knowen in the worlde, nor any Bishoprike there erected. A man might saye, Non satis commodè diuisa sunt temporibus tibi Daue haec.