A04474:1702
A reply unto M. Hardinges answerA replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare
A reply unto M. Hardinges answer by perusing whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weak, and unstable grounds of the Romaine religion, which of late hath been accounted Catholic. By John Jewel Bishop of Salisbury.A replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare by perusinge whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weake, and vnstable groundes of the Romaine religion, whiche of late hath beene accompted Catholique. By Iohn Iewel Bishoppe of Sarisburie.
Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the sign of the Black Oliphant, by Henry Wykes, Anno. 1565Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Blacke Oliphante, by Henry VVykes, Anno. 1565
Article 4 › The B. of Salisbury.Article 4 › The B. of Sarisburie.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
But I will not use this advantage. I judge rather, that this Theodoretus, as he was a man of deep learning, and great renown, so he was also a careful, and godly Bishop. As for the Nestorian Heresy, he defied it in the Council of Constantinople, and openly pronounced,1 Anathema Nestorio, Accursed be Nestorius.
But I wil not vse this aduantage. I iudge rather, that this Theodoretus, as he was a man of déepe learninge, and great renoume, so he was also a careful, and godly Bishop. As for the Nestorian Heresie, he defied it in the Councel of Constantinople, and openly pronounced,1 Anathema Nestorio, Accursed be Nestorius.
- 1Concil. Constantinopol. Actio. 8.
In these words that M. Harding hath here alleged, he saith nothing, that of our part is denied. Certainly, here is not one word, neither of the Head of the Church, nor of Universal Bishop.
In these woordes that M. Hardinge hath here alleged, he saith nothing, that of our parte is denied. Certainely, here is not one woorde, neither of the Head of the Churche, nor of Uniuersal Byshop.
But if Theodoretus think, S. Paul went up to Jerusalem, either to visit Peter, as the Head of the Church, as M. Harding seemeth to guess, or else to be better resolved of his Doctrine, as standing in some doubt, whether he had thitherto preached the truth, or no, then doth he quite overthrow S. Pauls whole meaning. For it is plain, that S. Paul knoweth not Peter for his Head, but contrary wise taketh him as his equal: