A04474:1772
A reply unto M. Hardinges answerA replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare
A reply unto M. Hardinges answer by perusing whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weak, and unstable grounds of the Romaine religion, which of late hath been accounted Catholic. By John Jewel Bishop of Salisbury.A replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare by perusinge whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weake, and vnstable groundes of the Romaine religion, whiche of late hath beene accompted Catholique. By Iohn Iewel Bishoppe of Sarisburie.
Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the sign of the Black Oliphant, by Henry Wykes, Anno. 1565Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Blacke Oliphante, by Henry VVykes, Anno. 1565
Article 4 › The B. of Salisbury.Article 4 › The B. of Sarisburie.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
In the Council of Nice it is Decreed thus,1 Ab alijs excommunicati, ab alijs ad Communionem ne recipiantur. Let not them that stand Excommunicate by one Bishop, be received again to the Communion by any other. M. Hardinges Appeals, and these words can not well stand together. But he will say, The Bishop either of ignorance, or of malice may Excommunicate the party wrongfully. In this case the same Council hath provided remedy of Appeal, not unto the Bishop of Rome, but unto a Provincial Synod within the Country. These be the words, 2Ergo, ut haec possint digna examination perquiri, rect• visum est, per singulos annos, in singulis provincijs, bis in anno, Episcoporum Concilium fieri, ut simul in unum conuenientes ex communi Provincia, huiusmodi questions examinent. Therefore that these things may be well examined, it is well provided, that every year in every Province, at two several times, there be holden a Council of Bishops, that they meeting together out of all parts of the Province, may hear, and determine such complaints.
In the Councel of Nice it is Decréed thus,1 Ab alijs excommunicati, ab alijs ad Communionem ne recipiantur. Let not them that stande Excommunicate by one Bishop, be receiued againe to the Communion by any other. M. Hardinges Appeales, and these woordes can not wel stande togeather. But he wil saye, The Bishop eyther of ignorance, or of malice maye Excommunicate the partie wrongfully. In this case the same Councel hath prouided remedie of Appeale, not vnto the Bishop of Rome, but vnto a Prouincial Synode within the Countrey. These be the woordes, 2Ergo, vt haec possint digna examinatione perquiri, rect• visum est, per singulos annos, in singulis prouincijs, bis in anno, Episcoporum Concilium fieri, vt simul in vnum conuenientes ex communi Prouincia, huiusmodi quaestiones examinent. Therefore that these thinges maye be wel examined, it is wel prouided, that euery yeere in euery Prouince, at two seueral times, there be holden a Councel of Bishops, that they meetinge togeather out of al partes of the Prouince, maye heare, and determine suche complaintes.