A04474:1802
A reply unto M. Hardinges answerA replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare
A reply unto M. Hardinges answer by perusing whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weak, and unstable grounds of the Romaine religion, which of late hath been accounted Catholic. By John Jewel Bishop of Salisbury.A replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare by perusinge whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weake, and vnstable groundes of the Romaine religion, whiche of late hath beene accompted Catholique. By Iohn Iewel Bishoppe of Sarisburie.
Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the sign of the Black Oliphant, by Henry Wykes, Anno. 1565Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Blacke Oliphante, by Henry VVykes, Anno. 1565
Article 4 › The B. of Salisbury.Article 4 › The B. of Sarisburie.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Ostiensis words be these, Non nocebit error, si appelletur ad Maiorem, quàm debuerit, vel ad parem. The error shall not hurt, if the appeal be made, either to a higher Judge, then was meet, or to an equal. Where also it is thus noted in the Margin, Appellari potest ad parem, si de hoc sit consuetudo. Appeal may be made unto the equal, if there be a custom of it. Hereby it is plain, that the right of appeal by fine force of Law, concludeth not any necessary superiority: much less this infinite power over the whole Universal Church.
Ostiensis woordes be these, Non nocebit error, si appelletur ad Maiorem, quàm debuerit, vel ad parem. The errour shal not hurte, if the appeale be made, either to a higher Iudge, then was meete, or to an equal. Where also it is thus noted in the Margin, Appellari potest ad parem, si de hoc sit consuetudo. Appeale may be made vnto the equal, if there be a custome of it. Hereby it is plaine, that the right of appeale by fine force of Law, concludeth not any necessarie superioritie: muche lesse this infinite power ouer the whole Uniuersal Churche.
But M. Harding might soon have foreseen, that this his first principle of Appeals would easily be turned against him self.
But M. Harding might soone haue foreséene, that this his first principle of Appeales woulde easily be turned against him selfe.
First, for that it is well known, that Appeals then, even in the Ecclesiastical §1causes, were made unto the Emperors, and Civil Princes.
First, for that it is wel knowen, that Appeales then, euen in the Ecclestastical §1