A04474:1832
A reply unto M. Hardinges answerA replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare
A reply unto M. Hardinges answer by perusing whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weak, and unstable grounds of the Romaine religion, which of late hath been accounted Catholic. By John Jewel Bishop of Salisbury.A replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare by perusinge whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weake, and vnstable groundes of the Romaine religion, whiche of late hath beene accompted Catholique. By Iohn Iewel Bishoppe of Sarisburie.
Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the sign of the Black Oliphant, by Henry Wykes, Anno. 1565Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Blacke Oliphante, by Henry VVykes, Anno. 1565
Article 4 › The B. of Salisbury.Article 4 › The B. of Sarisburie.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The B. of Salisbury.
The B. of Sarisburie.
What we may think of the other Hundred proofs, which M. Harding, as he saith, hath left untouched, it may the sooner appear, for that this one proof that is here brought forth in stead of all, is not only untrue, but also utterly without any shadow, or colour of truth. These authorities of Leo, Symmachus, and Bonifacius, for as much as they are alleged without words, may likewise be ⟨p. 278⟩past over without answer. Howbeit this Bonifacius the second, in defence of this quarrel, is forced to say, that S. Augustine that Godly Father, and all other the Bishops of Africa, Numidia, Pentapolis, and other countries adjoining, that withstood the proud attempt of the Bishops of Rome, and found out their open forgery in falsifying the Nicene Council, were altogether inflamed, and lead by the Devil.
What wée may thinke of the other Hundred proufes, whiche M. Hardinge, as he saith, hath leafte vntouched, it may the sooner appeare, for that this one proufe that is here brought foorth in stéede of al, is not onely vntrue, but also vtterly without any shadow, or coloure of truthe. These authorities of Leo, Symmachus, and Bonifacius, for as muche as they are alleged without woordes, may likewise be ⟨p. 278⟩past ouer without answeare. Howbeit this Bonifacius the seconde, in defence of this quarel, is forced to saye, that S. Augustine that Godly Father, and al other the Bishops of Aphrica, Numidia, Pentapolis, and other countreis adioyninge, that withstoode the proude attempte of the Bishops of Rome, and founde out their open forgerie in falsifieinge the Nicene Councel, were altogeather inflamed, and leadde by the Diuel.